Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:41:12 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 06/09/2011 02:53 PM, Pat Gunning wrote:
>
> Expanding this line of argument, it seemed to me that he was saying
> that each type of SOCIETY would tend to have its own logic.
If by "logic" you mean certain formal rules for transforming premises
into conclusions, then no, each society does not have its own logic. If
by "logic" you mean the way they construct their premises, the
authorities, concepts, and notions to which they make appeal, then of
course each society has its own logic.
> This is the basis for my reference to polylogism. It is similar to the
> Marxist polylogism to which I referred, in which each CLASS has its
> own logic.
Based on the second definition of "logic," I think it clear, by common
human experience, that each class does have it own logic. At certain
times, there might be some great overlap and a high degree of social
cohesion; at other times, less so.
John
|
|
|