SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:25:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Mason

My admittedly sarcastic recent response was not prompted by Veseth’s agenda,
but rather the agenda you sketched yourself, in his name.

With regard to that, Daniela’s question to you, regarding your supposed
early Medici "democracy", remains unanswered.

Regarding your “alienated proles”, do you hold the opinion that Savanarola’s
agenda can be dismissed as a blip?  Would you distinguish it from that of
say Cromwell, or the Pilgrim Fathers?

Rob Tye, York, UK

ATOM RSS1 RSS2