 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:02:58 +0000 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I asked for an axplanation about the concept of 'democracy' you are referring to.
Thanks,
Daniela
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Per conto di mason gaffney
Inviato: marted́ 30 ottobre 2012 02:11
A: [log in to unmask]
Oggetto: Re: [SHOE] risk and Far East philosophy/economics
Rob,
I do not find the message from Daniela to which you refer - or any message later than 2010. Computers do weird things up in the clouds. Please forward said message to me for comment.
Lest I be guilty of overparticipating, I will not wander into Cromwell or the Pilgrims. They lead us away from the original issues.
Mason
-----Original Message-----
From: Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rob Tye
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 2:25 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SHOE] risk and Far East philosophy/economics
Mason
My admittedly sarcastic recent response was not prompted by Veseth's agenda, but rather the agenda you sketched yourself, in his name.
With regard to that, Daniela's question to you, regarding your supposed early Medici "democracy", remains unanswered.
Regarding your "alienated proles", do you hold the opinion that Savanarola's agenda can be dismissed as a blip? Would you distinguish it from that of say Cromwell, or the Pilgrim Fathers?
Rob Tye, York, UK
|
|
|
