SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
michael perelman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:19:14 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
I don't have my copy at home, but see

Stone, Richard. 1997. Some British Empiricists in the Social Sciences
1650-1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University).


On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Humberto Barreto <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Davenant and King were friends. Most people assume that Davenant took
>> the idea from King.
>
> Thanks, Michael.
>
> Stigler wrote:
> "A  century  later  these  calculations  were
> attributed  to  Gregory  King  by  Lord
> Lauderdale,28  without  any  known
> basis ;29  and  since  then  they  have  usu-
> ally  been  known  as  Gregory  King's
> "law."
>
> That's where I got my understanding that Davenant was the first, but I
> confused it in retelling it. Sigh.
>
> Still leaves the question of why "most people" credit King. Stigler is
> saying "without any known basis." Any thoughts or citations on that?
>
> --
> Humberto Barreto
> www.depauw.edu/learn/microexcel
>



-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2