SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
michael perelman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:06:46 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<34A94B1EF52043F98AF2F24421E1BB5A@RichardPC>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Isn't there a long history of countries denigrating other countries'
potential because of cultural failings, especially when religious
differences were concerned?  Don't A&R fall into that genere, except
that the relevant religion is market worship?

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Richard Lipsey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I believe Acemoglu and Robinsons' treatment is useful but one sided. I agree
> with Jared Diamond in his review( New Your Review of Books) that even on
> their own level of analysis they omit some important forces, such as access
> to waterways, climate, and soil fertility.


-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2