------------ EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
Published by EH.NET (February 2007)
Timothy J. Botti, _Envy of the World: A History of the U.S. Economy
and Big Business_. New York: Algora Press, 2006. xxx + 701 pp. $36
(paper), ISBN: 0-87586-431-7.
Reviewed for EH.NET by Howard Bodenhorn, Department of Economics,
Yale University.
Timothy J. Botti, an independent scholar, holds a Ph.D. in the
history of American foreign policy, but considers himself an expert
on the history of empires, military and strategic history, and
economic and business history. In the foreword to his book, Botti
informs us that his aim is to provide the reader with an approachable
narrative about how four centuries of individual and collective
action generated a $12 trillion modern economic powerhouse that is
the "envy of the world." In doing so, he traces the increase in
business activity and economic output from the Jamestown arrival up
to the present. Modern Americans, he correctly notes, are virtually
awash in the cornucopia of goods and services provided by a
post-industrial economy. It is the breadth and depth of U.S. material
wealth that sets the country apart from most of the world.
Botti's fundamental question: "How did this come to pass?" is, of
course, of fundamental importance and enduring interest to economic
and business historians. It is a shame that the author fails to
provide meaningful insights. What he provides, instead, is a mountain
of information without much analysis. There is no theoretical
structure underlying the narrative so that, at the end of the book, I
was left wondering what I had learned. Botti's thick book is lacking
in depth.
Botti arranges his material chronologically and, for expositional
purposes, divides U.S. history into four epochs: Foundations
(1607-1860); Business and Government Compete for Supremacy
(1861-1945); Economic Possibilities (1946-1989); and Old versus New
Economy (1990-2004). Every author is, of course, free to divide
history into as many and as large or small segments as suits his or
her purpose, but the fact that fourteen years of the "new economy"
are covered in 215 pages versus the 95 pages devoted to the first 253
years of the "ancient economy" is a nod to contemporary fascination
with the ubiquity of the microprocessor and the so-called "dot-com"
boom, while failing to appreciate legitimate doubts about the
microprocessor's true transformative effect.[1]
My substantive complaint has little to do with the author's choice of
chronological divisions or fascination with the new economy, but with
his expositional style. The historian's task is to organize material
in such a way as to make sense of the rush of past events. Without
imposing some narrative structure, history becomes little more than a
recitation of what one of my college history professors labeled "one
damned thing after another." Rather than accept the historian's task,
Botti reinforces the apparent randomness of events through his
narrative structure. In the ten paragraphs devoted to consumer
expenditures as a driver of the U.S. economy in the postwar
(1946-1960) period, he tells us that political leaders did not want
to swing back toward interwar protectionist policies; that pent-up
consumer demand "brought greater prominence and profits to a raft of
companies;" that, despite mounting evidence of the health risks
associated with cigarettes, R. J. Reynolds' sales soared; that
increased competition between the oligopolies squeezed out small
producers; that Gillette introduced Foamy saving cream and Right
Guard deodorant in aerosol form; that Kodak hit it big with the
Brownie Starmatic camera; that wartime gasoline rationing nearly
devastated the Howard Johnson restaurant chain; and that Aramark
emerged as major vending machine-based retailer (pp. 292-95).
Each of these topics might serve as a springboard into a meaningful
discussion of larger implications, such as the waxing and waning of
corporate calls for protectionism, or oligopolistic practices, or
massive investments in corporate R&D or the growing pressure on
corporations to behave in socially responsible ways. But here, as
throughout the volume, such opportunities go unexploited.
As a full-time economic historian I found the volume disappointing
because it fails to demonstrate a grasp of, or even acknowledge, some
of the most important contributions of thirty years of new economic
history to our understanding of the American experience. It is
troubling how few of these new interpretations have found their way
into the historical discourse. It is particularly troubling in this
instance that they haven't even found their way into a volume
ostensibly describing the economic history of the United States.
As a part-time business historian I found the volume disappointing
because, at its best, business history is by turns insightful and
engaging, informative and entertaining, interesting and eclectic.
Botti's volume exhibits few of these qualities.
As I read Botti's book, I kept wondering about his intended audience.
The book is inappropriate as a primary, or even supplementary, reader
in an economic or business history course, mostly because it lacks
any substantive analysis, organizing theme or theoretical
superstructure. Readers in search of source material in business
history may find some of Botti's thumbnail sketches of firms and
their founders of some value, but several business history
encyclopedias better serve that purpose. Finally, it is unlikely to
attract a popular audience because the narrative is not particularly
engaging. I am therefore at a loss in identifying an appropriate
audience.
Note:
1. Robert Gordon, "U.S. Economic Growth since 1870: One Big Wave,"
_American Economic Review_ 89:2 (May 1999), 123-28; Joel Mokyr, "Are
We in the Middle of an Industrial Revolution," Federal Reserve Bank
of Kansas City _Economic Review_ (1997); and Jeremy Greenwood and
Mehmet Yorukoglu, "1974," _Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on
Public Policy_ 46 (June 1997), 49-95 all cast doubt on whether the
computer represents a fundamental technological change of the same
magnitude of the technological breakthroughs of the late nineteenth
century, such as electricity, the internal combustion engine, or
plastics and pharmaceuticals.
Howard Bodenhorn, Visiting Professor of Economics at Yale University,
is author of _A History of Banking in Antebellum America: Financial
Markets and Economic Development in an Age of Nation Building_
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000) and _State Banking in
Early America: A New Economic History_ (New York: Oxford University
Press, 2003). He is currently writing a history of free African
Americans in the antebellum South.
Copyright (c) 2007 by EH.Net. All rights reserved. This work may be
copied for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to
the author and the list. For other permission, please contact the
EH.Net Administrator ([log in to unmask]; Telephone: 513-529-2229).
Published by EH.Net (February 2007). All EH.Net reviews are archived
at http://www.eh.net/BookReview.
-------------- FOOTER TO EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
EH.Net-Review mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://eh.net/mailman/listinfo/eh.net-review
|