SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:32:40 -0500
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Hayek and trade unions
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
From:
Alan G Isaac <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
On 11/14/2013 4:13 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> I remain puzzled as to why some historians of economic thought
 > can't seem to shed their Keynesian beliefs in the face of analysis clearly
> contradicting them.


Perhaps because they care about the empirical evidence:
http://equitablegrowth.org/2013/11/12/622/oh-dear-megan-mcardle-relies-on-john-cochrane-and-so-goes-badly-astray

hth,
Alan Isaac

ATOM RSS1 RSS2