Not really. Although Garegnani was not fond of the distinctions of Sraffian schools as proposed by Roncaglia, the latter´s idea is that one of the so-called Sraffian Schools was Marxist (Garegnani´s one; Pasinetti being the Ricardian, and Labini the Smithian). And yes the New Interpretation and the Temporal Single-System school are most definitely not Sraffian. I do suggest in this regard the work of Gary Mongiovi on the second school published in the Review of Radical Political Economics in the Fall of 2002 (vol. 34 no. 4, pages 393-416) for a Sraffian view of their contributions.
Matías Vernengo
Associate Professor
University of Utah
260 Central Campus Drive, Room 371
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
(801) 349-9462
________________________________________
From: Societies for the History of Economics [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wells, Julian [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 4:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SHOE] what is the proper way to call a follower of Pierro Sraffa?
Daniela's suggested would appear to include (or exclude, depending which way round you look at it) Marxist currents including followers of the New Interpretation and Temporal Single-System currents, among others.
Julian Wells
-----Original Message-----
From: Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Parisi Daniela Fernanda
Sent: 27 January 2012 00:15
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [SHOE] R: [SHOE] what is the proper way to call a follower of Pierro Sraffa?
I think the correct term is "modern clkassical political economy".
You may have a good analysis of this 'problem' in: A. Roncaglia, Piero Sraffa, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009 . He defines three sraffian followers: Pasinetti, Garegnani e Sylos Labini (cfr. cap. 8).
Daniela Parisi
________________________________
Da: Societies for the History of Economics [[log in to unmask]] per conto di andres lazzarini [[log in to unmask]]
Inviato: giovedì 26 gennaio 2012 22.49
A: [log in to unmask]
Oggetto: Re: [SHOE] what is the proper way to call a follower of Pierro Sraffa?
As far as I know, the (unfortunate) term "Neo-Ricardian" was first introduced by Bob Rowthorn in a paper published in 1974 in the New Left Review. Later on it was also used by Frank Hahn in his 1982 CJE paper "The neo-Ricardians".
Andres Lazzarini
2012/1/26 Matias Vernengo <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Yep we prefer Sraffian. Neo-Ricardian was a name given by certain Marxist authors that suggested that Sraffa was not a Marxist. Also, more recently the term Neo-Ricardian has been used with respect to Barro´s Ricardian Equivalence theory.
Matías Vernengo
Associate Professor
University of Utah
260 Central Campus Drive, Room 371
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
(801) 349-9462
________________________________________
From: Societies for the History of Economics [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Lee, Frederic [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [SHOE] what is the proper way to call a follower of Pierro Sraffa?
That is correct. Look at "Conference of Socialist Economists and the Emergence of Heterodox Economics in Post-War Britain," Capital and Class, 75 (2001) for some discussion about the rise of the use of neo-Ricardian as a name for Sraffians.
Fred Lee
Professor Frederic S. Lee
Editor, American Journal of Economics and Sociology
President, Association for Institutional Thought
Department of Economics
University of Missouri-Kansas City
5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
USA
E-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Tel: 816-235-2543
For Heterodox Economics Newsletter: http://www.heterodoxnews.com
For the Association for Heterodox Economics: http://www.hetecon.net
For Association of Institutional Thought: http://www.associationforinstitutionalthought.org/
-----Original Message-----
From: Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Stanislaw Kwiatkowski
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [SHOE] what is the proper way to call a follower of Pierro Sraffa?
I have a vague memory of reading somewhere, that followers of Pierro Sraffa dislike being called "neo-Ricardians".
My problem is that I don't remember were have I read it.
If there is anybody on the list (knowledgeable enough or considering himself a follower of Sraffa) that would know what is the proper way of addressing them, I would be much obliged for a tip, and - if possible - a citation.
Thank you in advance,
Stan Kwiatkowski,
Poland
--
Stanisław Kwiatkowski
Instytut Misesa
www.mises.pl<http://www.mises.pl>
+48 609711878
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
|
