SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Sat, 23 Nov 2013 06:43:14 +0100
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: The Keynesian multiplier
From:
Daniele Besomi <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 lines) 
Since Cannan was mentioned, some may be interested in this exchange of views between him and Harrod on this precise point in November and December 1933:

http://economia.unipv.it/harrod/edition/editionstuff/rfh.164.htm#marker=36637

Best, Daniele Besomi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2