SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
mason gaffney <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Feb 2014 19:00:18 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Thank you, but be so kind as to supply a citation to Ott, or some
commentator.  Also to the Swedes you reference.

Preferably send citations in English.  I can also handle French, struggle
through German, but not Swedish.

Thank you,

Mason

-----Original Message-----
From: Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Daniele Besomi
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:11 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SHOE] L'offre crée même la deman de

mason gaffney asks:

> In all this discussion of Say’s Law, something missing is the role of
anticipations.  I write not to argue any point, but to ask of the group if
anyone else has?

Auguste Ott, 1854. He started from questioning Say's law, but his
constructive theory is based on the disappointment of expectations, very
much anticipating the Swede's argument some 70 years later.

Daniele Besomi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2