SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Ross B. Emmett)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:34 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
===================== HES POSTING ================== 
 
[Posted on behalf of Roger Backhouse. -- RBE] 
 
 
Susan Fayazmanesh has a paper 'On Veblen's coining of the term 
"neoclassical"' in Fayasmanesh and Marc R Tool (eds) _Institutionalist 
Method and Value: Essays in Honour of Paul Dale Bush, vol 1_. Edward 
Elgar, 1998. It debates Aspromourgos's arguments about Veblen's use of the 
subject. She also reminds those of us who have read the General Theory 
that Keynes thought Marx the inventor of the term "classical economists". 
 
 Roger Backhouse 
 
 
 
 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2