SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:23 2006
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
This is slightly beside Roy Weintraub's point about how 20th century HET is 
taught, but is not totally irrelevant. Several years ago I taught a senior 
course in HET to a small group of very good students. I had them read 
summaries of Smith, Marx, Marshall and Veblen in standard texts and then we 
read biggish chunks of what these men wrote. As a last exercise I had them 
read a portion of _The General Theory_ and then had them read what 
Samuelson said about Keynesian economics in an earlier and then in a later 
edition. I also asked them to remind themselves of what they had learned 
about Keynes in macro courses. I suggested that HET didn't end in 1899 or 
1929 and asked them to write an essay on how HET was created and formed. It 
was an interesting exercise. 
 
Anne Mayhew 
 
 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2