------------ EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
Published by EH.NET (June 2006)
Helle Porsdam, editor, _Copyright and Other Fairy Tales: Hans
Christian Andersen and the Commodification of Creativity_.
Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2006. vi + 172 pp. $85 (cloth), ISBN:
1-84542-601-0.
Reviewed for EH.NET by B. Zorina Khan, Department of Economics,
Bowdoin College.
Once upon a time a professor of American Studies at the University of
Southern Denmark had a cute idea. She would edit a volume of essays
that employed the literary device of linking Hans Christian Andersen
(1805-1875) to the authors' own particular dicta on copyright policy.
Helle Porsdam (for that is the name of our editor) herself would
compose a preface to summarize the contributions of her essayists and
to introduce Hans Christian (HCA) as the "best of story tellers" to
those of us who were more familiar with Pikachu or Scooby Doo rather
than the Little Match Girl. The truth is that the real HCA had
little or nothing to do or say about copyright; but, rather than
unpleasantly carping about minor details, let us, like all consumers
of fables, ignore such inconvenient facts and turn our attention to
the narration.
The first chapter is related by Lawrence Lessig, who starts out with
the obligatory reference to HCA but cleverly employs a Dr. Seuss-like
accent: "Knowledge is remix. Politics is remix. Remix is how we
create. Remix is how we recreate. ... Think a bit about this concept
of 'remix.' Think a bit about 'remix' in particular before
technology got into the mix. Think about it before Hollywood got in
the mix" (p. 16). Lessig's point is that we all recreate and
reinterpret culture, either as writers, readers, viewers or
commentators. Social constraints on our ability to reconstruct
culture range from none (an animated discussion about a movie among
friends) to state-imposed remedies (jail and a $250,000 fine for
illegal copying of the same movie.) Technological innovations such
as digitalization have had a dramatic impact on the culture of
remixing: the "explosion" of copying on the Internet; the "war" and
"battles" against piracy; and the "weapons" used to prevent illegal
remixing. Copyright law, in this new regime, imposes prohibitively
high costs on the creative process of remixing. The raconteur, as in
all fairy tales, knows the way through this maze. One example is the
nonprofit organization he founded, the Creative Commons, which
specifies the commercial uses that can be made of works by the
participants in the Commons.
Stina Teilmann, in the second chapter "On Real Nightingales and
Mechanical Reproductions," stays closer to the HCA trope
(metalepsis?) and gives several examples of HCA's fairy tales that
centered on real versus imitation articles. Her article explores the
issue of authenticity in the history of copyright laws in France and
Britain. Initially a distinction was drawn between a copy (specific
to printing and closely related to the original) and a reproduction
(images that are clearly different from the original), but over time
the two terms were conflated in copyright law. The Internet
comprises the final stage of this conflation, where every copy is an
original in itself, with the "same ontological status." Since
copyright law depends on the prohibition of the reproduction of
originals, it "cannot cope with the order of sameness on the
Internet" (p. 34). Leslie Kim Treiger-Bar-Am's contribution,
"Adaptations with Integrity," can also be viewed as another facet of
the issue of authenticity, since the essay examines one of the
so-called moral rights of authors to control changes to their work.
The chapter proposes (p. 62) that "modifications to all artforms, and
of all types, ought potentially be actionable pursuant to the
integrity right."
In the realm of books, authenticity is frequently linked to the
"authorization" of individual writers. Uma Suthersanen examines the
way in which authors developed as stakeholders in the quest for an
international copyright in the nineteenth century. The expansion of
markets on both sides of the Atlantic enabled the emergence of a
class of professional writers who lobbied for recognition of
international copyrights. Charles Dickens was interested in
international copyright and HCA knew Charles Dickens but the
skeptical among us might have some trouble in viewing this as per se
evidence that HCA was interested in copyright issues of the
twenty-first century. Like the central characters in many HCA tales,
Fiona Macmillan makes a virtue of necessity and acknowledges upfront
that her article comprises "a flight of imaginative fancy" regarding
what HCA might have to say about copyright rules today. She
concludes by doubting that HCA "would have been sanguine about the
picture of cultural homogenization and domination painted above" (p.
101), much less the commodification of culture. Michael Blakeney
considers the "propertization of traditional knowledge" with an
emphasis on the Australian experience.
Lee Davis, another contributor to this volume, is also concerned
about digital cultural goods in the realm of copyright. The final
chapter, by Marieke van Schijndel and Joost Smiers, imagines a
(presumably better) "world without copyright." Digital technologies,
by "axing the roots of the copyright system," have made copyright
impossible or at least redundant; and for today's developing
countries, intellectual property "is nothing but a disaster" (p.
149). The alternative they propose is a model of usufruct without
property rights, a model that might be applied equally to other forms
of intellectual property, but they leave the working out of the
technical details to a future date.
We may suppose that the editor of "Copyright and Other Fairy Tales"
does not literally mean to imply that all claims in this book are
akin to fairy tales. Still, as in effective fairy tales, at times
the artless reader may be confused about the distinction between the
authentic Hans Christian Andersen and HCA, the character created as a
projection of the authors' own views. The lack of recognition of his
copyrights "sickened" Andersen; yet Porsdam is hopeful that he would
agree with authors of the articles in her book who feel that
"copyright is not and should not be considered as 'property'" (p. 9).
(An equally interesting literary exercise might be to assess what
Edward Elgar would say about calls for the end of copyright.) As
for copyright policy itself, this book is useful in offering several
viewpoints, and if none of them is from an economist's perspective we
have only ourselves to blame for not paying more attention to this
important subject. Moreover, I did learn the surprising fact that
there is actually an HCA story that I have yet to read, called
"Auntie Toothache." Or was that just another abstruse metonym for
intellectual property in the twenty first century?
B. Zorina Khan is Associate Professor of Economics at Bowdoin
College, a member of the National Bureau of Economic Research, and
the author of _The Democratization of Invention: Patents and
Copyrights in American Economic Development, 1790-1920_ (Cambridge
University Press, 2005).
Copyright (c) 2006 by EH.Net. All rights reserved. This work may be
copied for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to
the author and the list. For other permission, please contact the
EH.Net Administrator ([log in to unmask]; Telephone: 513-529-2229).
Published by EH.Net (June 2006). All EH.Net reviews are archived at
http://www.eh.net/BookReview
-------------- FOOTER TO EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
EH.Net-Review mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://eh.net/mailman/listinfo/eh.net-review
|