Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:18:40 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What is a definition of economics for? Why would we want
one?
For a dictionary definition, see a dictionary, or observe
how the word is actually used. Both might give confusing
results, but that reflects actual usage.
Possibly more enlightening - try to find out who is
generally counted as an economist (supplementary question:
by whom?) and observe what they do. Or observe journals
generally counted as economics journals (by library
classification? weighted by some means, such as citation
counts?) and see what they publish. Or look at research
funding (history of economics would pretty well vanish by
that criterion!).
That would tell you what economics actually is, not what
someone thinks it ought to be. Do something similar for past
periods to find out what economics used to be. Making up
definitions, possibly to reflect some idea of what you wish
your colleagues were doing, is fun, but does it get us
anywhere?
Tony Brewer, University of Bristol ([log in to unmask])
|
|
|