SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 02:52:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Hello Nicholas

>  I think Viner was too much of a scholar to commit a joke in print.

I would read more than a joke into this comment

Blaug made it what he calls a rallying cry of the anti-Popperians, and that
seems to me closer to the mark.  Regardless of who said "economics is what
economists do", it neatly sums up, for me, the kind of intellectual
relativism championed by Wittgenstein and his associates.

Which leads me to a observation regarding that somewhat notorious
confrontation between the two parties, Wittgenstein and Popper (the poker
incident)

Has anyone ever pointed out or discussed the curious historical fact that
Popper (certainly) got his professorship through Hayek, and Wittgenstein
(arguably) got his professorship through Keynes?

Rob Tye, York, UK

ATOM RSS1 RSS2