SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:07:02 -0400
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Critiques of Keynesian Economics and the Stimulus
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
From:
Alan G Isaac <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
On 4/12/2014 11:57 PM, Robert Leeson wrote:
> Friedman's (1953) clear statement about contemporary notions of a Phillips curve trade-off


That's what I'm asking for.  A clear statement from
Friedman (1953) that he accepted an inflation/unemployment trade-off.
Can you provide a quote?

Just to be clear, I am not doubting these ideas were floating about.  E.g.,
http://richmondfed.org/publications/research/economic_review/1985/pdf/er710502.pdf

Thanks,
Alan Isaac

ATOM RSS1 RSS2