SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tim Barker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:31:41 -0500
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Don't know if it's comprehensive, but I've found this helpful:
https://www.brookings.edu/book/the-politics-of-inflation-and-economic-stagnation__trashed/
This is a more recent essay in a somewhat kindred vein:
https://campuspress.yale.edu/stefaneich/files/2015/09/Eich-and-Tooze_The-Great-Inflation-1r9nnx3.pdf

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Nic Johnson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear SHOE,
>
> Is there a comprehensive review of 1970s-vintage theories of inflation out
> there? I know it was a time of great disagreement -- OPEC, unions, corporate
> monopoly power and administered prices, money growth, and the Phillips curve
> were all explanations -- but if there's an article or two that spells them
> all out, I'd love to see it.
>
> Thanks,
> Nic
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2