Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:29:23 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Michael,
a brief consultation with the OED suggests that dedication could be plausible:
"To dedicate (a writing or work of art) to a person by a short inscription (placed at the beginning of a writing, or beneath a picture, etc.), less formal than an ordinary dedication."
see in more detail at - http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/96648
Best wishes,
Pedro
Pedro Nuno Teixeira
Director - CIPES, Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies
Rua 1º Dezembro, 399, 4450-227 Matosinhos; Portugal
+351 - 22 9398790 (phone); +351 - 229398799 (fax)
Associate Professor - Faculty of Economics, University of Porto
Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200 Porto, Portugal
+351 - 225571100 (phone); +351 - 225505050 (fax)
________________________________________
De: Societies for the History of Economics [[log in to unmask]] em nome de michael perelman [[log in to unmask]]
Enviado: segunda-feira, 7 de Novembro de 2011 17:02
Para: [log in to unmask]
Assunto: [SHOE] translation help
Dugald Steward in his Account of Adam Smith wrote:
If he had not been prevented by Quesnai's death, Mr Smith had once an
intention (as he told me himself) to have inscribed to him his 'Wealth
of Nations.'
Does "inscribed" indicate the he would send him a copy or dedicate it
to him. One source says dedicate, but I am unsure about believing it.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929
530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com
|
|
|