SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Tue, 4 Feb 2014 18:10:58 +0100
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Daniele Besomi <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
mason gaffney asks:

> In all this discussion of Say’s Law, something missing is the role of anticipations.  I write not to argue any point, but to ask of the group if anyone else has?

Auguste Ott, 1854. He started from questioning Say's law, but his constructive theory is based on the disappointment of expectations, very much anticipating the Swede's argument some 70 years later.

Daniele Besomi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2