Call for papers
Oeconomia – History /Methodology/Philosophy,
Special Issue: “Economics and literature: beyond praise and disparagement”
Deadline for submission: November 1st , 2012
Planed publication of the issue: 2013
Editors: Estrella Trincado Aznar, Jérôme Lallement
See http://weboeconomia.org/call_for_papers.html .
Since the nascent of political economy in 17th century, and even before,
literature has been both a place for broadcasting and challenging economic
ideas through idealizing fables and pastiches. In turn, economists could
borrow from literature some ways to present their own ideas or to criticize
alternative doctrines. The purpose of this special issue is to reflect on
the transformations of the frontiers between economics and literature: to
investigate how literature can reflect economic ideas and arguments and to
see how economics and economists have dealt with literary presentations of
economic ideas.
Regarding the complex links between economics and literature, it is quite
certain that very different national traditions can be identified. For
instance, it is sometimes said that the 1848 Revolution in France
established a clear-cut divorce between economics and literature. Similar
breaking points may have occurred at different times in different countries.
Later on, economists that were against the use of mathematical symbolism and
reasoning would be labeled “économistes littéraires”. From this last phrase,
one is allowed to think that, from the marginalist revolution onward, not
only literature had become of no use to the development of political economy
but also that it was now something incompatible with its development as a
science.
Things are probably not that simple, since the boundaries of literature
itself have necessarily changed in parallel with the transformations of
society, and that what could be expected from literature at the end of 19th
century, after the burst of modernity, was quite different from what could
be expected in the end of 17th century. Literature has always evolved in
relation to the development of society and human knowledge, taking as its
own raw material the representations of the world expressed in all fields of
science and philosophy. Therefore, literature has always redefined its own
boundaries as it was progressively facing the development of political
economy, moral philosophy and political thought as organized discourses.
Again, it would have to cope with the rise of other social sciences in the
19th century, and more largely with the institutionalization of the
production of knowledge and the rise of disciplinary boundaries.
Therefore, the interplay between economics and literature is twofold. On the
one hand, political economy progressively developed as an autonomous
discourse, where arguments, ways of thinking, proofs, debates,
contradictions, examples, commentaries, hypotheses, conclusions, have been
progressively normalized in such a way that literature would no longer
appear as an adequate means for broadcasting its own discourse and
representations of the world. On the other hand, as political economy was
progressively organizing itself as a discipline, literature would reflect in
a different way upon the development of economics, either to ridicule its
logical and abstract way of thinking, or to condemn its development as a «
dismal » science, or possibly to make it a source for literary inventions
and novelty.
Oeconomia – History /Methodology/Philosophy, plans to publish papers dealing
with this subtle and moving links between economics and literature. It
welcomes articles dealing with a particular work, author, national
tradition, or providing a broader view of the relations between economics
and literature through the study of specific genres and sub-genres (farces,
comedies, pamphlets, fables, novels, philosophical novels, essays, utopias,
etc.) and the way it is bound to reflect upon the transformations of
economics. Articles dealing with original economic ideas from well-known
writers are also welcome. Authors are invited to submit an article (in
English or in French) at: http://www.editorialmanager/oec. For any
complementary question, please contact us at [log in to unmask] Editors
should retain the right not to go ahead with the special receive enough
papers of sufficient quality. If there are some strong enough, then they
could be published as stand-alone papers.
|