Oh, no -- they absolutely did not. Not even close.


On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Arianela . <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Thanks for showing that the Library of Congress is making an effort
> to deal with this production.  I won't take the time to compare the two
> collections of errors we now can see, but I hope they took in all that
> was originally presented in this Forum.
> Arianne Laidlaw
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Peter Salwen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > That is discouraging, but Twain didn't have much use for critics, did he
> > ("the most degraded of all trades")?
> >
> > For anyone who's interested, by the way, you can find a bunch of
> > *additional* errors & omissions on the LOC's own errata sheet, which is
> > online at
> > http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2015/Files/TwainErrataSheet-Feb11-2015.pdf.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Arianela . <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> I hope that is so.  I notice the Amazon notice says that they are out
> >> of stock, but I was also disappointed to see some favorable reviews.
> >> Sigh
> >> Arianne Laidlaw
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Barbara Schmidt <[log in to unmask]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Arianne,
> >> >
> >> > To the best of my knowledge, the book was pulled from shipping and
> >> > further publication shortly after the problems were first acknowledged
> >> and
> >> > has never been rereleased.
> >> >
> >> > Barb
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Arianne Laidlaw A '58
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Arianne Laidlaw A '58
>