SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mason Gaffney <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:57:57 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Preteurs et emprunterus - I guess that means lenders and borrowers?
Neither class is all of a piece.  Economics requires that lenders be divided
between at least savers, who create capital,  and landowners who do not.

-----Original Message-----
From: Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Daniele Besomi
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 9:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SHOE] Sismondi and class struggle?

"L'interet d'un capital, par example, se détermine d'après le résultat d'une
lutte entre deux classes de personnes; les prêteurs qui veulent Jouir sand
travail, et les emprunteurs dont les fonds ne suffisent pas è leur travail
……  (Sismondi, De la richesse commerciale; ou, Principes d'économie
politique, appliqués a la législation du commerce, Geneva 1803, p. 73)

Best, Daniele Besomi




Il giorno 22-lug-2015, alle ore 17.35, michael perelman ha scritto:

> Marx cited Sismondi, in his preface to The Eighteenth Brumaire " "The
Roman proletariat lived at the expense of society, while modern society
lives at the expense of the proletariat."  Sismondi is often credited with
coining the term "class struggle," but did he really use that term?
> 
> -- 
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA
> 95929
> 
> 530 898 5321
> fax 530 898 5901
> http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2