Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:27:38 -0500 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The Gregorian calendar is more accurate in that
the vernal equinox falls within the same small
range of dates each year (March 20 or 21).
Calendar reform was important to the Catholic
Church because of the dating of Easter, which was
to be the first Sunday on or after the first
ecclesiastical full moon after the
ecclesiastically-dated equinox of March 21 (the
Muslim calendar is so much more empirical- the
new moon, which marks the beginning of a month,
has to be observed, not calculated, but that
Catholic requirement to predict the dates of
Easter years into the future did lead to
ingenious developments of algorithmic thinking
and the fixing of the reference point separating
BC and AD). The Church had dated the equinox as
March 21, because apparently the spring equinox
occurred on that date at the time of the Council
of Nicaea in 325 AD. By the time of Pope Gregory
it was apparent that the astronomical equinox was
occurring much earlier in the month, Easter was
losing its connection to the Jewish Passover, and
the ecclesiastical full moons were out of joint
with the astronomical full moons. So several
countries in Western Europe went from 4 October
1582 to 15 October 1852 – losing 10 days that
year - and the astronomical equinox fell once
again on March 21. By the time Britain made the
switch in 1752 from the Julian to the Gregorian
calendar there was an 11-day difference and by
the time Russia made the switch in 1918 there was
a difference of 13 days. The calendars were
different in that the Julian calendar did not do
those exceptional turn-of-the century adjustments
Peter described- only, as Barkley explained, the leap year every four years.
So accuracy for European calendars was defined in
reference to the sun/earth relationship. There is
a battle raging now among the worlds' time lords
as to whether the natural sun reference point
should be discarded (for time at least, not
calendars). Our standard of time is now "the
duration of 9,192,631,770 cycles of microwave
light absorbed or emitted by the hyperfine
transition of cesium-133 atoms." The rotation of
the earth has slowed since that standard was
established so in order to preserve the sun-based
accuracy of our time determined by vibrations of
the cesium atom we have to add leap seconds every
few years, messing up satellite communication
systems, etc. Physicists at the US Naval
Observatory (the time lords in the USA) want to
stop the sun reference (embodied in Greenwich
Mean Time) and rely purely on atomic time.
Astronomers are against this and point to a
future where noon could occur at nighttime if we
go to pure atomic time. This probably would have
no effect on the celebration of Adam Smith's
birthday, but it's another illustration of social
disputes generated by the imperfect meshing of
cycles and of the importance of control over time.
Judy Klein
|
|
|