Call for papers
“Interdisciplinary Futures: *Open the Social Sciences* 20 years later”
Conference on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of Open the Social
Sciences (1996)
19-20 January 2017
Lisbon, Portugal
Organised by INTREPID <www.intrepid-cost.eu> and TINT
<www.helsinki.fi/tint> with support from the Calouste Gulbenkian
Foundation <https://gulbenkian.pt/en/>
Conference web site here: https://ifoss20.wordpress.com/
Keynote speakers:
Immanuel Wallerstein on "Forty Years Later: Are the Social Sciences
More Open?”
Björn Wittrock on "Social Sciences in Their Contexts: Five
Transformative Periods"
Felicity Callard on “The social sciences, life sciences and
humanities: shifting plate tectonics”
BACKGROUND
The slim but remarkable volume (Open the Social Sciences: Report of
the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences)
was published in 1996. The Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation had
established, in 1993, the multidisciplinary Gulbenkian Commission on
the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. After three years of work,
led by Immanuel Wallerstein, the Commission published its report (with
Stanford University Press). The Report analysed the situation in the
social sciences, its origins, and possible futures, making
recommendations for improvements, largely based on ideals of openness
and interdisciplinarity. These deals have gained ground more broadly
since then in the academia. The report attracted attention and incited
commentary and some debate within the social sciences.
This year, 20 years have passed, and it is now an opportune time to
revisit the themes and suggestions of the Report. Many of them are
still very timely, awaiting further examination and debate. On the
other hand, some things have changed in the social sciences and their
various boundary conditions. It will be important to update the
diagnoses and proposals accordingly. Reconsidering the Report and its
messages collectively at a conference will provide an opportunity to
address the challenges in a way that is respectful for historical
continuity and generative of novel and updated insights.
CONFERENCE THEMES
The conference will focus on three general themes related to the
Report of the Gulbenkian Commission:
1. The Report itself, its background, its context, its diagnoses, its
messages, its arguments, its recommendations -- both historically and
analytically considered.
2. The issue of how to update the Report, based on what has changed
since 1996 regarding the themes and claims and arguments in the
Report, asking how the report would look like if written today. How
has the situation changed? What are the urgent issues of
interdisciplinarity today?
3. Independently of the Report itself, contemporary developments and
future scenarios, examining current trends plus anticipating and
designing the future of the social sciences from the point of view of
interdisciplinarity. This includes mutual relations amongst the social
sciences as well as their relations to other disciplines (such as
neuroscience, genetics, evolutionary biology, ecology, geography,
archaeology, physics, computer science, and others), to methodological
developments (e.g. computational and experimental techniques), to
developments in the institutions and organisations of research and
higher education, and to various non-academic partners and pressures.
We invite contributions that approach the themes in terms of case
studies and detailed (more detailed than was possible in the short
Report for the Gulbenkian Foundation) analyses of trends and practices
and possible futures of scientific inquiry and education, its changing
cognitive structures, institutional contexts, and interdisciplinary
interconnections.
We welcome proposals from scholars active in a variety of research
fields, from history and philosophy of science to the various
disciplinary perspectives applied to the study of science, science
policy, and higher education (those from economics, sociology,
political science, anthropology, management, education, communication
studies, bibliometrics etc). Mixing such perspectives will yield a
rich and comprehensive picture of the future of interdisciplinarity in
social science.
Examples (just examples!) of possible themes:
• Ways of opening the social sciences – promises, obstacles, risks
• Hopes and prospects of unified social science
• Cognitive and institutional conditions of interdisciplinarity
• “The two cultures” – past, present, future
• Forms of collaboration and dominance between disciplines
• Natural sciences, social sciences, humanities: chances of (un)learning
• Roles of neuroscience, genetics, and evolutionary biology in social sciences
• Consequences of big data and data processing technologies
• Roles of techniques (e.g. of modelling, simulating, experimenting)
in bringing disciplines together
• Roles of social sciences in projects led by natural sciences
• Policy relevance of research and interdiscplinarity
• Roles of social sciences in addressing and solving wicked problems
• Consequences of extra-academic participation for the sciences of society
• Consequences of contemporary governance of science and higher education
• Reconfigurations of science-society relations
• The West and the rest in the (social) sciences
• Challenges in the management of interdisciplinarity.
SUBMISSION OF ABSTRACTS
In addition to submitting an abstract of a single paper, you are also
welcome to propose a whole session of 3 (or 4) papers (sessions are
envisaged to be 90 minutes).
Abstracts of single papers should be 500-600 words. Proposals for full
sessions should include a general abstract of 300-400 words describing
the theme of the session plus separate abstracts of each paper of
300-400 words.
Please submit your abstracts through EasyChair.
https://ifoss20.wordpress.com/abstract/
DEADLINE
The deadline of submitting your abstract is 15 September 2016
CONTACT
In all matters concerning the conference, please first contact
research assistant Sofia Blanco Sequeiros at sofia.blancosequeiros
[at] helsinki.fi
--
Uskali Mäki
Academy Professor
TINT - Centre of Excellence in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Department of Political and Economic Studies / Philosophy
University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/tint
http://www.helsinki.fi/tint/maki
[log in to unmask]
|
