Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 9 Nov 2019 19:49:03 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well, and I mean this with the greatest respect, the same could be said of Hal Holbrook's Mark Twain Tonight. He was portraying a Mark Twain who never was, but so convincingly that I think many people who saw it (myself included) came away believing they were as close to seeing the original Twain as was possible.
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Martha Sherwood
Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2019 7:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: new film Harriet
I cannot comment on this film, which I have not seen, but Amazing Grace is a good example of a Hollywood movie which has the trappings of historical accuracy but portrays events in a thoroughly fictitious manner.
Martha Sherwood
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 7:15 AM Hal Bush <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> folks, I believe some of you will be interested:
>
> Perhaps this is predictable (it's really, really hard to depict these
> histories to everyone's satisfaction at the current moment): but the
> controversy over the new film Harriet is for real (even though it has
> a full 99% audience-like rating on rotten tomatoes).
> & ps: I have encouraged my own students to see it (they all read Uncle
> Tom's Cabin & Douglass' Narrative this semester): I'd love hearing
> anyone's thoughts about the film, as either a teaching device or just
> an aesthetic/historical account.
>
>
> https://www.theroot.com/despite-controversies-cynthia-erivo-as-harriet
> -tubman-1839590139
>
>
>
> Dr. Hal Bush
>
> Professor of English &
>
> Director of the Undergraduate Program
>
> Saint Louis University
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
> 314-977-3616
>
> http://halbush.com
>
> author website: halbush.com
>
|
|
|