SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Ross B. Emmett)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:04 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Since I invoked Knight's name, and Mary picked up on it, let me just add  
that altho Knight believed that government action was necessarily  
coercive, he believed the coercion was necessary (if lamentable).  Just as  
he believed that order was as essential to society as freedom (and in  
conflict with it), he also believed that force was as necessary as  
voluntary exchange (and obviously the two were in conflict). 
 
I might add that Knight often argued that love and force were, in the  
final analysis, equal (the point being, that "love" was a poor reason for  
social action). He was ever the cynic. 
 
Ross 
 
Ross B. Emmett, Augustana University College, Camrose, Alberta 
CANADA   T4V 2R3   voice: (403) 679-1517   fax: (403) 679-1129 
e-mail: [log in to unmask]  or  [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2