SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Pat Gunning)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:03 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Bill Williams asks for evidence that individuals perceive utility and he doubts that it
can be provided. It seems to me that acceptance of the assumption that individuals
perceive utility is a prerequisite for entry in the club of economists. Why would Bill
raise any question about it?
 
I take it (1) that the main interest of economics is the market economy and (2) that
economists since Adam Smith (and before of course) have described it by referring to the
choices of actors. Since the marginal utility revolution of the late 19th century, they
have used the word "utility" to refer to that which motivates the choice of one
alternative over another. So what is the problem, Bill? Do you have in mind some new kind
of economics?
 
Pat Gunning 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2