Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jérôme de Boyer des Roches <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:05:30 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
What is bank’s liquidity risk? Do banks have to 
take such a risk? Do banks which take this risk 
diminish or increase the « security of publick 
»(Smith, WN, Liberty Classics, p. 329)? The 
answer to these questions divided the classical 
and neo-classical economists. Cantillon, Hume, 
Steuart, Smith , Thornton, Ricardo, Torrens, 
Tooke, Bagehot, Kemmerer, Fisher, Hawtrey, Mints, 
etc… did not have the same analysis. In my 
opinion, it is useful that historians of economic 
thought try to give some light on these controversies.

Jérôme de Boyer des Roches