SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"E. Roy Weintraub" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:05:34 -0500
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>
> I am well aware that Keynes was capable of saying different things to
> different people on the same issue, but I'm surprised that the preface to
> the German edition is different in English from the one in German!
>

In my soon to appear "Keynesian Historiography and the Anti-Semitism
Question" (History of Political Economy, vol. 44 no. 1 (2012), pp.
41-67), I quote from a letter from Patinkin to Skidelsky in which he
referred to Keynes' unpublished note on Einstein as "even worse than
the morally insensitive Preface to the German edition". Skidelsky has
a discussion of the German Preface of course. Put another way, and to
reconnect to the Subject line, this is well-known "old stuff" for
Keynes scholars like Bateman and Backhouse.


-- 
E. Roy Weintraub
Professor of Economics
Fellow, Center for the History of Political Economy
Duke University
www.econ.duke.edu/~erw/erw.homepage.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2