Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:37:25 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Nope neither of these either.
Jules
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Twain Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Matthew Seybold
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 2:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: a question regarding intelligence
There may be some variation upon this in the trial of Laura Hawkins in = THE GILDED AGE or in PUDD=E2=80=99NHEAD, but this sounds to me like the = lines from CHRISTIAN SCIENCE:
=E2=80=9CWe know exactly where to put our finger upon his insanity: it = is where his opinion differs from ours=E2=80=A6The rule is perfect: in = all matters of opinion our adversaries are insane.=E2=80=9D (Chapter V)
=20
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Alan Kitty <[log in to unmask]> =
wrote:
>=20
> What about the courtroom scene in Colonel Sellers? I don't recall if
>=
that s=3D
> cene also appeared in Gilded Age. These references assume of course =
that a "=3D
> book" also might include a play.
>=20
> Sent from my iPhone
>=20
>> On Jan 23, 2017, at 1:50 PM, JULES AUSTIN HOJNOWSKI =
<[log in to unmask]> wr=3D
> ote:
>> =3D20
>> The only book I can think of that had a court in it is the c. yankee
>> =
one
>> And I brought up the text or that book on my computer and did a =
search and=3D
> =3D3D
>> that phrase does not come up in that book. I do not recall any of =
his oth=3D
> e=3D3D
>> r works have a court scene in it.
>> =3D20
>> I am not sure that he wrote it. But I could be mistaken ;)
>> =3D20
>> Good luck.
>> Jules
>> =3D20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Twain Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Allen =
Brafma=3D
> n
>> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:12 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: a question regarding intelligence
>> =3D20
>> someone please remind me in which of Twain's work is the court scene
>> =
where=3D
> =3D3D
>> the narrative voice says something along the following lines:
>> =3D20
>> =3D20
>> a person considers another person intelligent if that other person =
says so=3D
> m=3D3D
>> ething that is in agreement with the first person's own thinking
>> =3D20
>> =3D20
>> I thank you all in advance for your attention to this
>> =3D20
>> =3D20
>> Allen Brafman
|
|
|