SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Tom Walker)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:19 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
Although he may have invented the wording, Keynes certainly didn't  
invent the incorrect abbreviation of the issues. There is a 1924 textbook  
discussion by Raymond Bye of fallacies of overproduction (Bye cites  
Fred Taylor's textbook as a source) that is emphatic in the claim that  
overproduction CAN'T occur because Say's Law says it can't. Bye  
spends several pages addressing the "lump of labor fallacy", which  
purportedly asserts there is a fixed amount of work to be done. But  
since supply creates its own demand (Say's Law) there obviously is not  
a fixed amount of work to be done (lump of labor fallacy).   
 
All of which relies on the omission of Mill's qualifying phrase. I dare  
say the old wages-fund doctrine plays an important role behind the  
scenes in assuring the imaginary certainty that increased supply creates  
its own demand.   
 
Tom Walker 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2