Warren, on the centrally important point that some parts or 
our decision making is nondeliberative, and some parts are 
deliberative, I couldn't recomment more highly the recent work 
of _my_ intellectual mentor and thesis advisor Larry Wright. 
 
See his: 
 
Larry Wright, "Argument and Deliberation:  A Plea for Understanding", 
_Journal of Philosophy_, Nov. 1995, pp. 565-585. 
 
Wright, IMHO, (and I am biased on this matter), is one of the great 
thinkers currently on the scence.  Alex Rosenberg bluntly calls Wright 
the most important writer on teleology since Aristotle (see Wright, 
_Teleological Explanation_), and he does so without any tone of 
exageration. 
>From my own perspective, this work on teleology is just a part of far 
deeper insights on deliberation, skills, argument, and understanding which 
are to be found in Wright.  Some of Wright's own intellectual mentors and 
influences include Michael Scriven, Norwood Hanson, and Wesley Salmon 
as teachers, and Thomas Kuhn and Ludwig Wittgenstein and intellectual in- 
fluences.  I think, Warren, that you will find Wright's discussion of 
the role of background understanding, tacit nondeliberative skill, and 
argument structure in deliberative argumentation to be helpful in thinking 
about the some of the relations between nondeliberative and deliberative 
decision making. 
 
Greg Ransom 
Dept. of Philosophy 
UC-Riverside 
[log in to unmask]