Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:43:55 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks for the responses to date, but we may be darting down a rabbit
burrow, or at least opening a different thread.
Obviously the old and basic question of whether the interest rate is
a price at all / the price of what (money, loans, waiting) still has sting.
<The rate of interest is not a price. It is the discount rate, or
the average of the population's preference for goods now versus goods later.
Scot Stradley>
If the interest rate is a discount rate reflecting time preference,
then it reflects a swapping ratio between a bundle of present
consumption vs future consumption. I thought that a swapping ratio is
exactly what a relative price is. If I understand "the" Austrian
position at all, an artificial lowering of the interest rate sends a
signal that gives an incentive for firms to over-invest in long-lived
capital. I'd call an incentive signal a price. If the interest rate
is not a price, what is this thing that the Fed is levering at will?
I add that the Fed does not have the clairvoyant power to discern and
then announce a change in the economy's time preference.
Bruce Littleboy
|
|
|