SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Peter G. Stillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:25:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
There is also J S Mill's famous argument in On Liberty that parents 
could or should be restricted from bringing children into the world 
unless they could raise them.

That argument he makes with reference to his argument about liberty, 
and self- and other-regarding actions.  I had always gone tied this 
argument to his sense of liberty (and, perhaps, as a necessary step 
in the logic, the centrality of the [egalitarian] family for social 
development).   But perhaps the private good / public good 
distinction would be at work?


Peter G. Stillman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2