SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
definition of economics
From:
[log in to unmask] (Robin Neill)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:40 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
Sir: 
 
     If economics has no definition, we may still practice it, in an 
unselfconscious way.  If one wants to reflect on Economics, and the 
History of Economics does, then some idea of the subject of reflection 
is necessary, however fuzzy it may be.  Selfconsciousness is of the 
essence of the History of Economics.  How can one ramble through 
Sociology, Political Science, etc., without some way of distinguishing 
those disciplines from Economics? 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2