SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
HES: Re: DISC--Defending Individualism
From:
[log in to unmask] (Nicholas J. Theocarakis)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:53 2006
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
References:
<[log in to unmask]><[log in to unmask]><[log in to unmask]><001701c621f2$d3209d10$1a5cb382@MADRIGAL><[log in to unmask]><002b01c622b9$05cddef0$1a5cb382@MADRIGAL><BD57CA27C9DA2D408E0C28B4@[192.168.0.13]> <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Martin C. Tangora wrote:  
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TANSTAAFL  
>   
> TANSTAAFL = There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.  
>   
> Robert Heinlein (1966) ... not Milton Friedman!  
>   
> If you Google on the phrase "no free lunch"  
> you will learn about a family of theorems in  
> computational complexity theory.  
> ("No Free Lunch theorems")  
>   
  
  
It seems that there is no such a thing as a free hunch, after all.  
  
Nicholas J. Theocarakis

ATOM RSS1 RSS2