Pat's approach gets more arrogant (offensive) with each iteration,
repeating the conflation of marxism with racism.  Mises = science;
i.e. the Chicago doubts of his method sit right there with racism &
Marxism.  It seems that if you accept one of these theorems, you are
prepared to take on racism & Marxism.  A list like this should be
devoted to a dialogue rather than intolerant fundamentalism.



On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Pat Gunning <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> If you believe that one or more of these theorems helps you understand the
> world, then it follows that being able to classify the tactics and reasoning
> used by the critics of this economics helps you understand the world. It
> follows, in turn, that the concept of polylogism may help you understand the
> world. The concepts designated by the terms Marxist polylogism and racist
> polylogism can be defended on similar grounds.
>
> If you believe that these theorems do not help you understand the world,
> then the Swiftian analogy seems applicable.
>
>
> --
> Pat Gunning
> Professor of Economics
> Melbourne, Florida
> http://www.nomadpress.com/gunning/welcome.htm
>



-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com