Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 06:43:06 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sorry for the gobbledegook. I swear I had it set on "Plain Text." Computers
hate me, and the feeling is often mutual. Here it is again, typed in afresh,
with no pasting, in sincere hope that it is in English this time.
Because Twain is a master of satire, I wanted to share this call for papers with
you all. In the "Chronicle of Young Satan," he wrote that "Against the assault
of Laughter nothing can stand." What this panel seeks to explore is how sure
you can be that a satirist and his audience are laughing at the same thing and
what that uncertainty might imply. I think that this question is at the heart
of some of the recent controversies about the pain that words can cause.
Cheers,
Sharon
*************************
Modern Language Association Annual Convention 2012
Seattle, 5-9 January 2012
Satire's Double-Edged Irony
The American Humor Studies Association is seeking papers that explore the often
ambiguous nature of satire's object, the lines that blur between satire and
celebration, and the difficulty of predicting or controlling audience response.
Recent studies, such as "The Irony of Satire," suggest that the perception of
satire's object often rests in the reader's or viewer's own biases. This panel
is interested in exploring the implications of this ambiguity in the production,
deployment, and teaching of satire. How does this affect satire's admittedly
subversive purpose? Is this satire's power, its limitation, or both?
250-word abstracts by 15 March 2011.
Sharon McCoy
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|