SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Gabriel Sabbagh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Mar 2020 18:19:06 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Dear colleagues,

By limiting our activities the virus has allowed us to read more.
I am very grateful for the papers received recently which strengthen my optimism in the great ability of Economists.
In a very short span of time I discovered
two ‘giants’, Buchanan and Tullock (hpe  New Economics Papers on History and Philosophy of Economics
issue of 2020‒03‒23),
one ’titan’, Robert Gallman (review dated March 25 2020),
a ‘visionary’, Henri Fayol (hpe  New Economics Papers on History and Philosophy of Economics
issue of today). I was always fond of the French way of handling administrative things and am glad to discover its creator.
To be told today that Cantillon was the first ‘modern economist’ was a surprising anti-climax. I had expected Cantillon to be a 
pygmy, as Quesnay, Turgot and Adam Smith.

With best wishes,

Gabriel Sabbagh          

ATOM RSS1 RSS2