SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: "Austrians and Left Keynesians: a comparative analysis."
From:
Michael Nuwer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:31:29 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
Sheila Dow's book is the best comparison I've seen.It includes more than these 
two schools and it is longer than an essay. Maybe she would be willing to 
abstract a few of the main points.


The Methodology of Macroeconomic Thought: A Conceptual Analysis of Schools of 
Thought in Economics


----- Original Message ----
From: Robert Leeson <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thu, September 2, 2010 10:57:51 AM
Subject: [SHOE] "Austrians and Left Keynesians: a comparative analysis."

Who would be an appropriate person to write "Austrians and Left Keynesians: a 
comparative analysis." Has such an essay been written?

Robert Leeson
[log in to unmask] 



      

ATOM RSS1 RSS2