Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:37:35 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That is correct. Look at "Conference of Socialist Economists and the Emergence of Heterodox Economics in Post-War Britain," Capital and Class, 75 (2001) for some discussion about the rise of the use of neo-Ricardian as a name for Sraffians.
Fred Lee
Professor Frederic S. Lee
Editor, American Journal of Economics and Sociology
President, Association for Institutional Thought
Department of Economics
University of Missouri-Kansas City
5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
USA
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Tel: 816-235-2543
For Heterodox Economics Newsletter: http://www.heterodoxnews.com
For the Association for Heterodox Economics: http://www.hetecon.net
For Association of Institutional Thought: http://www.associationforinstitutionalthought.org/
-----Original Message-----
From: Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stanislaw Kwiatkowski
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [SHOE] what is the proper way to call a follower of Pierro Sraffa?
I have a vague memory of reading somewhere, that followers of Pierro Sraffa dislike being called "neo-Ricardians".
My problem is that I don't remember were have I read it.
If there is anybody on the list (knowledgeable enough or considering himself a follower of Sraffa) that would know what is the proper way of addressing them, I would be much obliged for a tip, and - if possible - a citation.
Thank you in advance,
Stan Kwiatkowski,
Poland
--
Stanisław Kwiatkowski
Instytut Misesa
www.mises.pl
+48 609711878
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|