------------ EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
Published by EH.NET (November 2007)
Janet T. Knoedler, Robert E. Prasch and Dell P. Champlin, editors,
_Thorstein Veblen and the Revival of Free Market Capitalism_.
Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2007. xxi + 239 pp. $125 (cloth), ISBN:
978-1-84542-540-1.
Reviewed for EH.NET by Warren J. Samuels, Department of Economics,
Michigan State University.
Within neoclassical price theory and its applications, a common
problem arises. Although the conventional protocol calls for unique
determinate optimum equilibrium solutions, a change in assumption or
circumstance yields two different such solutions. The problem has to
do with which price structure is to be used in making calculations,
the pre-change or the post-change structure. That problem is one of a
larger genre. Consider, for example, a change from one Smithian stage
to the next stage. Which cultural norms, which legal rights, and
which moral rules, as between the two stages, are to be used in
rendering interpretations and normative judgments? On a more homely
level, we observe intergenerational conflict, a conflict that is
perhaps sharpest between ?migr? parents and their children, each
raised in different cultures. The book under review is noteworthy for
its variations on the theme.
The editors are well-known institutionalists. Janet Knoedler is Chair
of the Department of Economics at Bucknell University. Robert Prasch
is in the Department of Economics at Middlebury College. Dell
Champlin is Visiting Professor of Economics at Western Washington
University. In the editors' introduction to the ten contributions
comprising this new collection, they argue that "to understand
Veblen, it must be appreciated that as a youth he came of age in a
time and place influenced by the Populist movement, but,
intellectually, he came of age during the Progressive era. As a
consequence, his thinking shares elements of both, but cannot be
located in either" (p. xiii). Each of the ten chapters raises the
problem, directly or indirectly. For that reason alone, the authors
are to be seen as breaking new interpretative ground in understanding
Veblen -- not as to whether or not he was correct but in
understanding the tensions and ambiguities raised by his analysis.
Perhaps the most pregnant essay, apparently the essay most deeply
felt by the editors, is that by the political scientist and Veblen
scholar Sidney Plotkin. In his view, Veblen distrusted both the
Captains of Industry and the legislators, judges and administrators
who form the government, all of whom operate on the basis of status
emulation centering on wealth. Government is an important institution
but its officeholders are much beholden to business. Democracy is
thus sabotaged from within, by those seeking hierarchical status and
by those seeking power. What is there about government which makes it
legitimate? If neither the leaders of business nor those of
government pay attention to the masses, except to identify what
political language will serve to manipulate them along desired lines,
is democracy a fraud?
Anne Mayhew's opening essay appropriately considers the place of
science in a society whose culture encompasses more than science.
Relying in part on insights from Joel Mokyr , Mayhew examines the
cultural foundations of the relationships between science and
technology and the questions which science is unable to answer,
questions of a religious and metaphysical nature. What is there about
science and metaphysics which lead some people to consider one and
not the other legitimate? What is there about biological and cultural
factors which lead some people to emphasize one and not the other?
She concludes with an even deeper query: "What should or can be
shielded from science and what opened to its dispassionate glare
remains a question to which Veblen gave no definitive answer" (p.
14). For some people, Veblen is so persuasive they readily overlook
his lack of conclusiveness when held at arm's length.
In a collection in which no chapter is weak, one of the deepest is
Robert Prasch's analysis of the origins and meaning of private
property. Property is to be understood in a context of power
structure, affirmation and denaturalization of property, status
emulation, property as a means of support and participation by the
individual, property as predation, the inevitable changes in the
institution of property, and so on. Every generation thinks that its
social construction of property is both the true one and the one from
time immemorial. Given change in the law of property, which law, the
old or the new, is to be the basis of interpretation and evaluation?
A similar situation pertains to the corporation and the various forms
of capital, outlined by Eric Hake. The evolution of the corporation,
capital, markets, asset valuation, credit, securities markets and
their sundry combinations, each of which defines the economy for some
people, can be unidirectional or multidirectional. The question,
which is the interpretive base from which all else is to be viewed,
announces the common problem. It is not only the institutions of
property and the corporation that have evolved. So too have the
cultural incidence of pecuniary institutions and the machine process,
their interrelations and the further "financialization" of the
economy, as Glen Atkinson puts it. William Waller examines the
variety of theories of exchange and of markets, as well as value,
from Adam Smith to the present, emphasizing what is missing in the
work of Veblen, though not in the work of numerous later disciples of
Veblen. When do we follow Veblen and when not?
Atkinson focuses on the evolution of the economy, and Waller
identifies what is missing from Veblen. Geoffrey Hodgson takes up
four myths of Veblenian institutionalism: (a) that Veblen's
psychology was behaviorist, (b) that Veblen saw individual behavior
as being almost entirely explained by culture or institutions, (c)
that Veblen upheld a "dichotomy" between institutions and technology,
and (d) that the work of Clarence Ayres represents a direct
continuation and development of Veblenian precepts (p. 127). All four
will be controversial, but especially the latter two.
Each chapter presents lines of reasoning and evidence that lead to a
further general question: Veblen developed his theories in the
context of his times. What would Veblen say about the new world of
business, government, higher education, and religion? It is because
the contributors to this volume are aware of the situational
specificity of Veblen's theories that each, so far from merely
rehearsing Veblen's ideas, wonders what "a reassessment and
reintegration" (p. 64) will look like.
While the insights of John R. Commons and Malcolm Rutherford are
amply and properly brought to bear by several contributors, only one
mention of Hyman Minsky is to be found and none of Daniel Bromley or
of A. Allan Schmid.
The contributors have two further things in common. Each chapter is
rich in detail and, although only Mayhew explicitly elaborates on
pragmatism in her account, pretty much all contributors tell stories
amenable to pragmatist interpretation.
I am not quite certain as to what lesson the editors intend to convey
by juxtaposing "the revival of free market capitalism" to Veblen. I
am, however, optimistic that the volume will mark the onset of a new
stage in the interpretation and reformulation of Veblen's
institutionalism.
Warren J. Samuels is Professor Emeritus of Economics at Michigan
State University. He is currently working on preliminary articles
based on his study of the use of the concept of the invisible hand in
economics.
Copyright (c) 2007 by EH.Net. All rights reserved. This work may be
copied for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to
the author and the list. For other permission, please contact the
EH.Net Administrator ([log in to unmask]; Telephone: 513-529-2229).
Published by EH.Net (November 2007). All EH.Net reviews are archived
at http://www.eh.net/BookReview.
-------------- FOOTER TO EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
EH.Net-Review mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://eh.net/mailman/listinfo/eh.net-review
|