Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:19:05 -0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Although we’ve had some interesting developments in the UK energy market
recently, whereby gas suppliers are supposed to have been competing
against each other but have, allegedly, been colluding – a different type
of co-operation, some might argue – thereby breaking the law.
Sorry to muddy the waters.
Bob
On Wed, November 21, 2012 20:37, Anthony Waterman wrote:
> The answer to the second question, I think, is easy. It is because
> 'competition' (under the rule of law) is one of the best ways human
> beings have hit upon for co-operating.
>
> Anthony Waterman
>
>
>
> On 21/11/2012 1:37 PM, Bruce Caldwell wrote:
>
>> Dear SHOE list:
>>
>>
>> I got the following 2 questions from Paul Rubin. Any takers?
>> Question: When was "competition" first used in economics. Harder
>> question: Why is the economy called "competitive" when it is actually
>> cooperative? Please answer to the list, and I'll forward the consensus
>> answers (if they emerge) to him. Bruce Caldwell
>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|