SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Pat Gunning <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:59:52 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Hi Axel:

I think you should have offered a prize to the HESer who gets the 
right answer! Nevertheless, you attracted many competitors.

If you are truly interested in the subject, you might want to know 
about the people who used the term "utility" without the adjective 
"marginal." Here is the result of Murray Rothbard's research on the 
issue. I wonder also whether the Islamic "economists" had something 
to say about this.

http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=104&chapter=23593&layout=html&Itemid=27


Pat Gunning

ATOM RSS1 RSS2