SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Axel Gosseries <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:28:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Dear colleagues,

I'm looking at normative arguments for and against expecting childless
people to contribute (e.g. through funding family benefits) to the
costs of having kids that parents have to incur.

I was wondering whether the idea of children as public goods had been
expressed and investigated far back in the history of economic thought.

Thanks!

Axel Gosseries

ATOM RSS1 RSS2