No, Pete, I'm looking for some help in locating were 
Paul Samuelsons 1981 paper on Schumpeter might have been 
published. 
 
And just as a postscript, related to Pete's remarks, 
in a reply to Samuelson on the question of whether Schumpeter 
ever pronounced on Hayek's final victory over Lerner and 
Lange, Hayek writes: 
 
"Schumpeter is of course psychologically a fascinating 
problem.  You might be amused by the following story.  When 
in March or April 1945 I read at Harvard my paper on 
"The Use of Knowledge in Society" under Schumpeter's  
chairmanship, I felt that out of curtesy I ought to leave 
out the last section in which I criticised him.  What  
was my disappointment when he concluded the discussion 
with something like, "We can of course agree to all that", 
evidently not comprehending to what direct contradictions to 
his views it led." 
 
Greg Ransom 
Dept. of Philosophy 
UC-Riverside 
[log in to unmask]