Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun Dec 31 08:48:55 2006 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
References: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Fred Foldvary wrote: "The more universal axiom is that of Carl Menger
(Principles of Economics, 1871), that values are subjective."
We've been over this territory before, but in case Fred has forgotten,
the subjectivity of values did not originate with Carl Menger, as many
'Austrians' I know tend to suggest. This is what Adam Smith had in mind
when he explained that "The word VALUE, it is to be observed, has two
different meanings, and sometimes expresses the utility of some
particular object, and sometimes the power of purchasing other goods
which the possession of that object conveys. The one may be called
'value in use;' the other, 'value in exchange.'" (WN, 1: 32). And this
is why Smith wisely focused on explaining value in exchange or market
prices. The other classics knew as much.
Of course, the subjectivity of values or utility of objects can be found
in the works of the Greeks, particularly Xenophon and Protagoras, before
Aristotle.
James Ahiakpor
|
|
|