SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Edith Kuiper <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:47:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
It seems to me that this idea of 'spontaneous order' implies that 
those practices popped up out of nowhere. Concepts like 'customs' or 
'shared habits' would apply much better, as these imply that 
individuals are born into a society that is used to do and organize 
things this way. This instead of assuming that this idea of a 
spontaneous order would in some way reflect their preferences.

Edith Kuiper

ATOM RSS1 RSS2