Aside from Knight's actual intent, how was Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit
interpreted by Reviewers/commentators when it came out on whether profit
should be attributed to luck or entrepreneurial judgment?  Did some
commentators view Knight's book as a challenge to a neoclassical
interpretation of profit as a reward to entrepreneurial judgment?

I would be interested in what observations Ross or others might have on this.

Thanks,

David Mitch