SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: is macro prior to micro?
From:
michael perelman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:39:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
One could compare the two approaches to molecular biology and anatomy.
 Each discipline offers a different perspective for understanding the
nature of a living creature.

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Gabriel Martinez
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Could anyone point me to the literature on the debate over whether we
> should think of Microeconomics or Macroeconomics as the fundamental
> aspect of the discipline?
>
> Gabriel Martinez
-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2